Leadership
Styles and Competencies of Kentucky School Principals: Transformational,
Transactional, and Laissez-faire Leadership
Analyze and present by: Punnarat Chinnapha, Ph.D.
Abstract
This study aimed to examine and provide
insight into possible relationships between principal leadership styles,
namely, transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire/passive in reference
to principal demographics and school demographics. Additionally, the study
analyzed whether principals align with authentic leadership competencies,
including transparency, self-awareness, and ethical decision-making. The
Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ), Authentic Leadership Questionnaire
(ALQ), and a demographic questionnaire were employed to collect data. Findings showed
significant relationships between alternative school principals and
transformational leadership scores. Additionally, results suggested male
principals are more likely to have transactional and passive leadership styles.
Additionally, the findings suggested that future research is necessary to investigate diverse principal populations in rural school settings
and other contexts.
Conceptual Framework & Research
Questions
There exists a vast number of literature supporting
the importance of leadership styles in educational settings and how leadership
styles can have a significant impact, direct or not, on school performance (Abdulrasheed
et al., 2016; Allen et al., 2015; Atasoy, 2020; Berkovich et al., 2019; Henry
et al., 2012; Khalifa et al., 2016; Welsh & Little, 2018; Urick &
Bowers, 2014). This study aims to examine and provide insight into possible
relationships between principal leadership styles in reference to principal
demographics and school demographics as well as examining whether principals
align with authentic leadership competencies. Thus, the main 6 questions are
formed as follows:
- To
what extent is principal transformational leadership related to principal
school type, school setting, biological sex, age, ethnicity, and education
level?
- To what extent is principal transactional leadership related to principal school type, school setting, biological sex, age, ethnicity, and education level?
- To what extent is principal passive leadership related to principal school type, school setting, biological sex, age, ethnicity, and education level?
- To what extent is principal transformational leadership related to principal self-awareness and ethical decision-making?
- To what extent is principal transactional leadership related to principal self-awareness and ethical decision-making?
- To what extent is principal passive leadership related to principal self-awareness and ethical decision-making?
Each research question was separated into hypotheses. Questions 1-3 contained 6 hypotheses each, and questions 4-6 contained 2
hypotheses each. Thus, this study examined 24 hypotheses in total.
Research Design & Methodology
The quantitative correlational study examined the
leadership styles of Kentucky school principals in varying educational settings
and of varying demographics. The quantitative correlational study utilized a
positivist research paradigm. Positivist research operates under
hypothetico-deductive research guidelines, which is cyclical and begins with
theories derived from literature, which build testable hypotheses (Park et al.,
2020).
This study examined the principal leadership styles of
Kentucky school principals in various education settings. The study also examined
correlations between principal leadership styles, namely, transformational,
transactional, and laissez-faire/passive and the demographics of biological
sex, age, ethnicity, and education level. Lastly, the study examined
correlations between principal demographics and leader decision-making and
self-awareness attributes. This research designs included descriptive and causal
research designs.
The independent variables in this study included
educational settings, principal demographics, and behavioral attributes of
principals. Dependent variables included transformational, transactional, and
laissez-faire/passive leadership competencies. The researcher utilized the
Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) 45-item, which measures transformational,
transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles and Authentic Leadership
Questionnaire (ALQ) 16-item, which measures a leader’s self-awareness, balanced
processing, ethical decision-making, and transparency (Cervo et al., 2016). The
MLQ and ALQ use a five-point Likert scale Both survey instruments allow the study
to examine principal leadership styles and attributes through self-reported
means.
Lastly, this quantitative research study emphasized the use of linear regression analysis as a data analysis tool.
Sample
The study utilized a purposive sampling of school
principals in Kentucky. Following Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval,
the researcher contacted current Pre-school – G.12 principals in Kentucky
within the study parameters via calls and email. She received 103 responses and
omitted 5 as unusable. Thus, the sample size is ninety-eight (N = 98).
The research utilized a G*Power analysis to determine
the appropriate target sample size of at least 68 participants, with a df
of 62.
The study utilized multivariable linear regression
analyses from JASP to analyze collected data. The regression coefficient, β,
suggested the influence of the independent variable (x) on a dependent variable
(y). The R2 values suggest variance between variables. The
p-value determines statistical significance (Schneider et al., 2010).
Findings
The demographics of the 98 surveyed Kentucky school
principals are as follows:
54 males (55.1%) and 44 females (44.9%)
Age: 3.1% aged 26-30 (n = 3), 7.1% aged 31-35 (n = 7),
26.5% aged 36-40 (n = 26), and 63.3% aged 40+ (n = 62).
Ethnicity: 98% is white/Caucasian (n = 96), 1% is
Black/African American (n = 1), and 1% is two or more ethnicities (n = 1).
Education Level: 93 respondents holding a master’s degree
(94.9%) and 5 holding a doctoral degree (5.1%).
Type of school: traditional school principals (n = 45,
45.9%), alternative school principals (n = 32, 32.7%), and dual-school type
principals (n = 25, 21.4%).
School setting: 64.3% reported a rural school setting (n = 63), and 35.7% reported an urban school setting (n = 35).
Below are the results of statistical data analysis
using linear regression analysis to provide findings to questions 1 to 3
(18 hypotheses were tested).
Below is an example of the statistical results using linear
regression analysis to provide findings to questions 4 to 6 (tested a total 4
hypotheses).
The first research findings indicated that alternative
and dual-school type principals are more transformational than traditional
school principals. Dual-type school principals are the least likely to be
passive-avoidant than alternative or traditional school principals. Moreover,
alternative school principals are more transactional than traditional school
principals.
Second, alternative school principals are more
transactional than traditional school principals. Additionally, biologically
male principals are less transformational than biologically female principals.
Third, dual-school-type principals are less passive
than alternative and traditional school principals. Additionally, biologically
male principals are more passive than biologically female principals.
Fourth, transformational leaders make ethical
decisions and are self-aware.
Fifth, transactional leaders make ethical decisions.
Sixth passive leaders make less ethical decisions and are less self-aware.
Limitations & Recommendations
The strength of this study provides insight into
Kentucky principals' transformational, transactional, and passive leadership
styles. Its implications can help superintendents with hiring processes for
school principalships. Additional research can yield more conclusive and robust
findings that will assist future educational policymaking, prescribed hiring
processes, and administrative leadership practices. Study replications should
cover additional geographical areas by extending the geographic parameters.
The limitations of this study address the lack of
qualitative approaches that could have provided more in-depth knowledge of the
subjects and their direct casual relationships. The survey is a self-reported
question that relies on human interpretation and self-perceptions, which may
cause bias in the responses.
No comments:
Post a Comment