Review of the Research Article: "The Status of Research in Educational Administration: An Analysis of Educational Administration Journals, 1999-2007"

Article by: Ven. Agalawatte Gnanavimala Thero (Id Num:236511002)

Research Report Link: (PDF) The Status of Research in Educational Administration: An Analysis of Educational Administration Journals, 1999-2007

---

General Overview

The research article by Ahmet Aypay and colleagues provides a comprehensive analysis of trends in educational administration research over a nine-year period (1999–2007). Based on 449 empirical articles from 13 journals, the study examines authorship patterns, methodologies, literature reviews, and topics covered in the field. The findings offer valuable insights into the evolving landscape of educational administration research and highlight methodological strengths and weaknesses.

---

Strengths of the Article

1. Extensive Data Collection

• The study covers a significant number of articles (449) from 13 different journals, enhancing the reliability and generalizability of its findings.
• The random selection of empirical studies ensures an unbiased representation of the research landscape.

2. Methodological Rigor

• The study employs document analysis to systematically categorize and assess the research articles.
• Quantitative methods such as frequency analysis provide a structured evaluation of trends.

3. In-Depth Authorship Analysis

• The study reveals significant trends in authorship, including the increasing prevalence of co-authorship and the rising participation of female researchers.
• The research highlights the dominance of North American and European contributions while acknowledging the lower representation from Asia and Africa.

4. Valuable Insights on Research Methods

• The article identifies the increasing use of qualitative research methods in educational administration studies.
• It highlights methodological gaps, such as limited reporting of reliability and validity in quantitative studies.

5. Thematic and Sub-Thematic Categorization

• The study classifies research topics into broad categories, with leadership, principalship, and administrative structures emerging as dominant themes.
• The detailed breakdown of subtopics offers a nuanced understanding of research priorities and gaps.

---

Areas for Improvement

1. Limited Discussion on Emerging Research Trends

• While the article provides a historical analysis, it could benefit from a more forward-looking discussion on how research trends might evolve beyond 2007.
• Addressing the implications of technological advancements on educational administration research would add contemporary relevance.

2. More Comparative Analysis Needed

• The study could enhance its impact by comparing findings with earlier reviews of educational administration literature to track long-term developments.
• A comparison with research trends in related fields such as educational policy or leadership studies could provide additional context.

3. Clarity in Data Presentation

• Some sections, particularly those on research methodologies and validity reporting, could benefit from clearer tables and graphical representations.
• A summary table comparing the most frequently studied topics across different periods would improve readability.

4. Underrepresentation of Non-Western Research

• The study acknowledges the dominance of North American and European contributions but does not deeply explore why research from other regions remains underrepresented.
• A discussion on barriers faced by researchers from Asia, Africa, and Latin America would add depth to the findings.

---

Conclusion

This research article offers a significant contribution to the understanding of trends in educational administration research. It provides a well-structured analysis of authorship, methodology, and research themes while highlighting key areas for future improvement. Strengthening the comparative analysis, enhancing data presentation, and incorporating discussions on non-Western research contributions would further enhance the impact of the study.

---